The Lover of Che and Marx


Samudrala Avinash Rahul Vamshi KrishnaWhat a long name. Does not sound at allLike the name of someoneWho belongs to the … More

“They are no philosophical race”: Nietzsche’s Critique of the Englishman’s Philosophy


Nietzsche reserved special contempt for the English philosophical tradition, seeing in its utilitarianism and empiricism a triumph of mediocrity over greatness. “Man does not strive for happiness; only the Englishman does,” he declared — skewering Bentham and Mill’s reduction of morality to mere comfort and calculation. For Nietzsche, British moral philosophy was herd morality dressed in academic clothing: it flattened human hierarchy, punished excellence, and mistook survival for nobility. Even Darwin’s legacy, filtered through Spencer, pointed downward toward the average. The English, he charged, were industrious but philosophically shallow — incapable of the dangerous, self-overcoming thought true philosophy demands.

Nava-Dvara Pura: Why the “Nine Gates” Body Metaphor in Indian Philosophy Is Inherently Patriarchal


The ancient Vedic concept of Nava-Dvara Pura — the human body as a city of nine gates — is one of Indian philosophy’s most sophisticated metaphors for embodied consciousness. But there is a profound problem hiding in plain sight: the template body is male. The female body possesses a tenth gate, the vaginal canal, yet the tradition universalizes nine as the human count, silently erasing female anatomy. Worse, in the Bhagavata Purana’s Puranjana allegory, the female principle appears not as the soul inhabiting the city, but as an object encountered within it — intelligence subordinated to a male sovereign.