“For a long time now, the role of the Brahmin has been outsourced to other countries, particularly Europe and the … More
Category: Political Philosophy
Latest Writings (and some shares)
The Questions Again, the moon comes up in the night Again, the stars They stir up in me some questions … More
Flower Power — I Have Revisited the 60s
Many recognize and acknowledge The enigma that he is Knowing he is an enigma Is not quite the same As … More
The Stupid Brahmin and His Even Stupider Janeu
“The moment I realized that it is only the Brahmin male who wears the janeu and not the Brahmin female, … More
Priti Interesting Pick
I shared with my friend my blog post“The Various Culinary (Philosophical?) Dispositions Round the World”And she picks this to highlight … More
Few More Sayings
“She was wearing the rose in her hair, and I was brushing off the snow from my jacket.” “Sometimes freedom … More
A Few Sayings
“Buddha misread the origins of suffering. The cause of suffering is God’s desire to appear as this creation.” “This is … More
The Lover of Che and Marx
Samudrala Avinash Rahul Vamshi KrishnaWhat a long name. Does not sound at allLike the name of someoneWho belongs to the … More
One More Look at the Caste System
“You are what your deep, driving desire is. As your desire is, so is your will. As your will is, … More
“They are no philosophical race”: Nietzsche’s Critique of the Englishman’s Philosophy
Nietzsche reserved special contempt for the English philosophical tradition, seeing in its utilitarianism and empiricism a triumph of mediocrity over greatness. “Man does not strive for happiness; only the Englishman does,” he declared — skewering Bentham and Mill’s reduction of morality to mere comfort and calculation. For Nietzsche, British moral philosophy was herd morality dressed in academic clothing: it flattened human hierarchy, punished excellence, and mistook survival for nobility. Even Darwin’s legacy, filtered through Spencer, pointed downward toward the average. The English, he charged, were industrious but philosophically shallow — incapable of the dangerous, self-overcoming thought true philosophy demands.