Kierkegaard saw life as a movement through three stages: aesthetic, ethical, and religious. The aesthete lives for pleasure and beauty but faces despair in the absence of meaning. The ethical person seeks order and integrity through moral commitment, discovering purpose but not ultimate peace. The religious stage transcends both—where faith defies reason and the self meets God in passionate inwardness. Kierkegaard’s vision is not about stages to climb but choices to make; each reflects how deeply one dares to live.
Category: Western Philosophy
Losing Ourselves to “The They”: Heidegger’s Warning to the Modern Mind
Heidegger’s Being and Time unveils a quiet tragedy of modern life — our surrender of authentic existence to what he calls “the They.” In our average, everyday way of living, we speak, think, and act as others do, letting social norms and public opinion define who we are. This conformity numbs our individuality and hides the deeper question of Being itself. The comfort of belonging replaces the courage to be. To live authentically, Heidegger urges, one must awaken from this anonymous existence and face one’s own finite self — not as “they” live, but as I truly am.
How to read ‘The School of Athens’ – a triumph of Renaissance art
In this instalment of the YouTube series Great Art Explained, the UK curator, gallerist and video essayist James Payne provides … More
When East and West Met Matter: Cārvāka and Epicurus on the Joy of Being Human
Long before science made “materialism” fashionable, two ancient traditions—India’s Cārvāka and Greece’s Epicureanism—dared to say that only the material world exists, that pleasure and reason, not gods or rituals, are the keys to human happiness. Yet, though they share a disbelief in the supernatural, they differ in spirit. Cārvāka celebrates life’s sensual immediacy; Epicurus refines pleasure into calm contentment. One urges us to taste life while it lasts; the other, to understand life so we can stop fearing it. Together, they remind us that meaning need not hide behind mysticism.
Where the Streets Have No Name: U2’s Anthem of Transcendence and Freedom
U2’s “Where the Streets Have No Name” is more than a rock song — it’s a cry for transcendence. Bono imagines a place where identity, class, and faith no longer divide us; where names and boundaries dissolve into something pure and infinite. Born from the streets of Belfast and the deserts of Ethiopia, it becomes a universal hymn for freedom — spiritual, emotional, and human. The music itself seems to climb toward heaven, mirroring our own yearning to break free from limitation and live in a world, or a state of being, where the streets truly have no name.
Why Sonam Wangchuk Matters: The Moral Compass of a Nation
Sonam Wangchuk stands as a moral compass in a time when dissent is under siege. In our co-authored piece for The Wire, we argue that his peaceful resistance—anchored in Gandhian ideals and ecological wisdom—embodies the conscience of modern India. Wangchuk’s fasts and climate-focused activism are not acts of rebellion but acts of restoration: of truth, environment, and democracy itself. His story is a mirror to the nation’s soul, reminding us that silence is complicity, and courage is the truest form of love for one’s country.
The World is in Your Mind – Subjective Idealism
The whole world is in your mind. Ask yourself how and where you know that your body is there? Obviously … More
The puzzle of the ‘idiot savant’
Even now, when we operate with the more inclusive category of neurodivergence as opposed to pathology, savantism’s rarity and precocity … More
When I first Came to the US two Political Issues Unexpectedly Disturbed Me
by Pranab Bardhan, an Emeritus Professor at Berkeley, with main interest in Political Economy, Global Affairs with special focus on … More
Political Philosophy as if the Neighbour Mattered
In an age of rising inequality and social fracture, Political Philosophy as if the Neighbour Mattered reimagines governance around one timeless principle — love thy neighbour as thyself. This framework transforms moral empathy into measurable public policy, proposing a “Loving Republic” where care becomes infrastructure, justice is restorative, and every law passes the “neighbour impact” test. Drawing from thinkers across civilizations — from Bhishma and Confucius to Rawls, Gandhi, and Habermas — it offers a practical constitutional model for inclusive, ecological, and compassionate governance that treats the good society not as an abstraction, but as a shared moral practice.