Sartre once warned men about the brutal truth: women only respect the man who has the strength to walk away.…
Why do you prefer to stay at home? | Carl Jung and the value of solitude
Solitude does not always mean emptiness. Carl Jung believed that moments of silence and being alone allow us to reconnect…
What Exactly Are A.I. Companies Trying to Build? Here’s a Guide.
Are they building an A.I. system as smart as humans? A godlike machine that will change the world if it doesn’t…
Service to God
“People keep saying, ‘Service to man is service to God.’ I say, ‘Service to animals is also service to God.’…
Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis on AI
(0:00) Introducing Sir Demis Hassabis, reflecting on his Nobel Prize win (2:39) What is Google Deepmind? How does it interact…
Layers of Truth – Philosophical Debate between Perspective Mapper & Sam, Mediated by Claude.ai
Is truth layered or singular? In this voice-led dialogue, Ranjit argues for levels of truth—conventional to ultimate—drawing on Vedanta, Buddhism, and lived context. Sam insists on “naked” nonduality: in the absolute, neither love nor compassion can arise because there is no second. Both concede a paradox: ultimate reality must speak through dual words, bodies, and choices. Meeting people where they are (upaya) becomes the bridge. Sartre’s freedom, Shankara’s clarity, and Christ’s command to love surface as touchstones. Finally, they converge: truth may be one, yet when it moves through the relative world, its authentic signature is love and compassion. Naturally.
Sam Upanishad
They know notBig Bang, they sayAn unproven theoryWho knows how it beganAnd what was there or notBefore it began. Forms…
A Long Story Short (My Autobiography)
I was born.God knows why. I am living.God knows how. I will die.God knows when.